I FEEL that your "endorsement" of Barack Obama in the Comment column
last week could be premature.
You mention the caveats but tend to gloss over what are the more
serious of them, for example the backing of Nation of Islam leader
Louis Farrakhan, an arch-antisemite - banned from entering Britain
- who would be delighted to see Israel demolished.
Secondly, Obama wishes to engage in face-to-face dialogue with
Iranian despot Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who continually reiterates his
boast to wipe Israel off the map and - ignoring futile sanctions
- continues to develop a nuclear arsenal, putting up two fingers
to the toothless UN.
Obama may well "abhor Hezbollah and Hamas", yet the latter wish
to see him "ensconced in Pennsylvania Avenue" (quote). With what
motive, I wonder?
He may also be opposed to mass repatriation of Palestinians and,
yes, he can afford to be "sensitive to Israel's security needs".
When you are competing for presidency of the most powerful nation
in the world and need every vote, you can be all things to all men.
Regarding America being Israel's greatest ally, of course this
is true. We have seen this over the past decades and Obama certainly
does not want to upset the applecart as every single vote of the
two per cent Jewish population is vital.
But as the article by Daniel Pipes suggests, the Islamic nations
expect Obama to "produce the goods" and to deliver in their name.
As Pipes says, "Muslims rarely see him as Christian but usually
as Muslim" (or ex-Muslim).
In Judaism, if your mother is Jewish, so are you. According to
Islamic law, as his father was Muslim, so is he.
For starters, Egypt, Indonesia and Libya all apparently claim
him as such. Thus most Muslims expect Obama to stand up and be counted
when the Palestinians proclaim their territorial aspirations and
the Lebanese air their grievances.
He may see himself as Christian - "I am not a Muslim" (quote).
Yet as you say, one Arab analyst declares that "Muslims are eager
to count him as one of their own", whether he wishes to admit to
it or not. To all intents and purposes, through birth he is one
of them.
Therein lies the conflict. Only when (and if) he is elected will
we be able to make our own assessment of his sincerity. Until then,
as the saying goes, talk is cheap. Let's wait for the deeds.
R L Miller,
Leeds.
E-MAIL: letters@jewishtelegraph.com
Full names and addresses must accompany letters and will be published
unless correspondents specify otherwise.